Sunday, October 26, 2008

For Initiative-1000

Imagine that a brutal car crash just happened on a major highway. The high-speed crash proved fatal for one of the victims, but the other person involved in the crash was hanging on by a thread in the mangled piece of metal that used to be his car as the ambulance rushed to the scene of the accident. Amazingly, as the ambulance arrives, the man is still alive as they put him in a stretcher and wheel him into the back of the ambulance. His wife heard of the news and was extremely delighted and grateful to hear that he was alive, but after coming to the hospital and visiting him, her mood changed drastically. His entire body was crushed by the wreck, and the only reason he was living is because he was hooked up to dozens of different machines. She tried to talk to him and get him to recognize her, but he was hardly conscious and was full of so many different drugs that he could barely even talk. After a couple of days she came back, and while he was able to talk, life was getting extremely hard for him because he had nothing to do all day but stare at the ceiling and feel pain whenever he breathed in. The nurse informed him that he only had five months left to live, and he tells his wife, “I don’t want to feel this kind of pain for five more months with no chance at actually becoming better. I want to end it now so I won’t be a burden to you or myself.” Sorrowfully, his wife agreed and asked the doctor about it. The doctor, however, said that it is against the law to give a patient a fatal dose of medicine. The man’s wife informed him of this, and at hearing this, many hurtful words were shouted. “How do they have the right to be able to control my life?” “Why do they care if I live or die?” “They are hurting me by keeping me alive! Can’t they see that?” He doesn’t know what he is going to do with his future.

Sadly enough, this is a situation that occurs in hospitals because of the law that says that it is illegal for a patient to be given a fatal dose of medicine to end his life. However, this situation and these feelings of pain could be completely avoided by the new initiative that is going to be voted on: Initiative-1000. Initiative-1000 was brought on by the friends and families of people who knew that they had no future life ahead of them except for being in the hospital, and wanted to end their lives prematurely, only to be denied by the government. These people founded Initiative-1000 under the reasoning that the government shouldn’t decide whether people who are in critical condition live or die, it should be the individual person’s decision.

There are many people who support Initiative-1000 and see why it is a good idea. One of those people is Nancy Niedzielski. Her husband, Randy, lived the last six months of his life suffering and dying from brain cancer in 2006. He wanted to end his life much like the scenario that was described beforehand. When he was denied the ability to end his life prematurely, he became very angry because he knew how much of a burden he was going to become to his family and friends. Nancy saw how angry her husband became and started to petition for Initiative-1000. So far, she has over 1,700 signatures for the initiative. Niedzielski says, “Nobody knows what they are going to want in the future. This is about giving people options and choice, because none of us knows how we’re going to die.” In Oregon, there is already a law that is similar to Initiative-1000 in place. In Oregon, lethal prescriptions have been given to 341 people who wanted to end their lives prematurely. Dr. Jack Leversee is another person who is for Initiative-1000. He says, “"The last thing I want is to be in an intensive-care unit in some hospital and being declared alive because I'm artificially on a breathing machine, keeping my heart going with a defibrillator, unconscious so I can't communicate with my family in any way. I don’t want that at all.”

There are also several arguments against Initiative-1000 because of people worrying that Initiative-1000 isn’t safe, but you can be assured that there are many different safety precautions that are put into Initiative-1000 so that it is as safe as can be. One opponent of Initiative-1000, Duane French, who has been disabled since age 14, says that once this initiative is put into place, people are going to see him as worthless, and something that shouldn’t be living. He says that it will start a whole new prejudice against disabled and handicapped people. This would be something to worry about, but there is a safety precaution built into Initiative-1000 that makes it safe for disabled people like Duane. Initiative-1000 says that patients must have a doctor’s approval saying that they have six months or less left to live before they can be prescribed lethal medication. This makes it safe for disabled and handicapped people. There are also some worries that Initiative-1000 may be carried out on people who are going to die, but haven’t actually given consent to taking lethal medication yet. This is also an uninformed argument, because Initiative-1000 also states that it is entirely the patients’ decision; they must choose that they want to take lethal medication. A doctor can prescribe lethal medication to a patient, but it is the patient that must administer the medication to themselves. This makes it safe for people who do not want to end their lives even though they are suffering in the hospital.

As you can see, Initiative-1000 is a completely safe law. People must have less than six months left to live, and they have to administer the medication to themselves. There are many people who believe that it is a good idea for people who have nothing left in their life but suffering to be able to end their lives prematurely. In the end, you have to put yourself in suffering peoples’ shoes. If you wanted to end your life, would you want other people controlling that option for you?

Sunday, October 5, 2008

Department of Defense President Speech

As President of the United States, I will make sure that our military stays in the best possible position and is ready to fight and defend our country at all times. I am not someone who wants to pick a fight with other countries, and I want to make sure that every man and woman who fights for the United States fights for a purpose, but as there are many countries out there that are hostile towards us, I feel that our military needs to be in the best shape it can be in at all times and is ready to defend and counter-attack any attack that happens to us.

Therefore, I think more research should go into advanced weaponry and military force, as well as more research being put into technology, as technology is helping to make our weaponry safer and more effective. Advancing in technology and technological weapons can help protect us from various countries where Islamic extremism is commonplace, and it can help us learn more about the threats that they are posing to us. As you probably know, the war on terrorism is a war that America needs to win in order to be safe and secure. Therefore, we will also need an excellent intelligence department that will be able to get information about our enemy and tell us about the plans they are making and how to defend ourselves better from those plans. If we fight this war intelligently against the terrorists instead of using brute force, less lives will be lost and everybody will benefit from the security and safety.

Missile defenses are another kind of defense that America needs to have in order to stay safe. Some people may cringe at the thought of missiles, but the missiles that we acquire are going to be used safely and securely and will only be used for security and never for a first attack. The missile defenses that we set up will intimidate hostile countries that also have missiles in place, such as Russia and China.

I also believe that to have a proper defense and to have safety, America needs to have more members in the armed forces. Right now, many men and women who have already fought in the armed forces at one time are now on their second, third, or even fourth tours of duty in Iraq or Afghanistan. I will not institute something such as a draft because I feel this way, but I think that army recruitment ads are vital to keeping our country safe and I feel that more Americans should be encouraged to help defend our country in order for everyone to be safe. All troops and families of troops that do join the armed forces will be treated well and will be given many opportunities with their loved ones. Veterans of the armed forces will be honored very well.

If you are going to have a good defense, you need to spend your money not sparingly, but wisely. If I am elected president, I will make sure that money that is spent on the armed forces is looked over very carefully and is put into the right places that will help protect all of America and not just certain interests that people have.

As you can see, all of my plans for the department of defense are in the interest of having a better defense, and therefore, keeping America safer and ready to defend itself if needed.

Thursday, September 25, 2008

Hefty to-do list

1. Growing fears of bank failures, a sinking dollar, $4 gasoline and an economy bleeding jobs. Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and tensions with Iran.

2. I was surprised that the United States had $5.6 trillion surplus because there are a lot of things that that money could be used for. I was surprised that what Bush did added $1.7 trillion to national debt because that is a lot of money and I thought he would be more concious on what he was spending. I was surprised that education ranks sixth in what Americans think is an important issue, because education is a very important thing and almost everybody in America has been through some sort of education.

3. One piece of bias is when the two presidents’ economic advisors talk about the candidate they are helping, because since they are trying to get that candidate elected, they are going to show more facts that favor that candidate. Another piece of bias is when the political science professor talks, because he is stating his own opinion on how people act in regards to the economy.

4. I think McCain would do a better job dealing with the issues because he plans to spend money during his campaign within the spending limits, he voted for an effort to cap greenhouse gas emissions, and says that there will be no new taxes if he is elected.

Monday, September 15, 2008

Dwight Eisenhower Speech

Hello, my fellow Americans. Today, I would like to share a story with you. Doud Dwight Eisenhower was born on September 24, 1917 and was nicknamed "Icky" by his parents. He died three years afterward. Then, a man named David Dwight Eisenhower was born, and he would go on to become President of the United States of America. I am that man.
It all started in a small farm house in Texas where I was born. I soon grew up happily and was on the football team at my high school. I then joined the army, where a nickname was given to me: "Ike." I eventually got to the rank of 5-star general officer. I helped serve in several wars, such as World War II. After I left the army, I started getting involved in politics and ran for President of the United States. My catch-phrase was quick and simple: "I Like Ike."
When I became President, I kept many of the "New Deal" programs, which were programs that helped poor and disadvantaged people in the world get restitution and possibly help them get out of the gutter, such as social security. I kept those programs that were underway in place, and I had even striven to make them better. One of the things I did was institute a new agency called the the department of health, education, and welfare. That helped make life better for people who were disadvantaged, such as people who were homeless or moneyless. Although that program is shut down, an agency that is still around now was spawned out of it: the department of education.
Another thing that I did as president is something that you all will probably thank me for: I signed the bill and helped build the Interstate Highway System, or as you fancy kids probably refer to now as "the highway." You crazy kids, shortening your names and such. Anyway, I originally wanted to build the Interstate Highway System because they would make quick escape routes for people if that city was ever caught up in a war, and it would make it easier for the military to move into the city. However, I soon realized that it would also be easy for citizens to regularly travel through them so they could get to their destinations more quickly.
One more thing that I did as president back then was support the trial of Brown vs. the board of education of Topeka. I believe that all students should have a right to have the same quality of education and the quality of education that they get shouldn't be decided on their skin color. When Washington D.C.'s schools became non-segregated, I told all Americans that Washington D.C. should be a role model for the rest of the country and that we should all treat each other equally.
Since I was so compassionate about human life and treating humans equally, I am guessing that if I was still alive today and had a brain that could function, I would allow same-sex marriage because it is essentially all about treating other human beings equally and fairly. I would probably also allow the death penalty, because I realize that when an innocent human life is lost, it is a tragedy and a life-changing experience for so many different people, and the person who ruthlessly murdered somebody who caused such an impact on other peoples' lives should be punished.
I would also probably be against high taxes because I believe that humans are already trying to survive with what they have, and many of them are in troubled and tough times, and not much of their hard-earned money should be taken away from them.
Well, thank you for listening to my speech. I know it may be hard to keep all of the information I spewed at you in your brain, but if you were going to remember one thing, remember this: "I Like Ike."

Tuesday, September 9, 2008

Blogger rules ranked

Blogger rules:
1. Please, no last names, school names or addresses.
2. Do not link to your personal blog/journal from your school blog; you might reveal information on there that you don't want to reveal on your school blog.
3. If you want to write your opinion on a topic, make sure you're not going to be offensive to anyone as you write it.
4. Never disrespect someone else in your blog, whether it's a person, an organization, or just a general idea. You don't want someone making a stab at what you are passionate about; don't do it to someone else.
5. Make sure things you write about are factual. Don't be posting about things that aren't true.
6. Don't write about other people without permission; if you can't get their permission, use first names only. Never share someone elses last name.
7. Always make sure you check over your post for spelling errors, grammar errors, and your use of words.
8. Watch your language! We're not at home, we are at school, this has to be at least remotely professional looking.
9. Keep it education-oriented. That means that you probably shouldn't discuss your plans for the weekend.

I think that not sharing last names, school names, or addresses is the most important part of the blogger rules because it could be a matter of life or death. If somebody disobeyed any of the other blogger rules, it could cause misinformation to be spread and peoples' feelings to be hurt, but if somebody finds out where you live or what school you go to, they could do something like kidnap you or murder you. I think we can all agree that one's personal safety should go before one's feelings.